top of page

Avoid or Remove? Choosing the Right Climate Contributions for a Meaningful Impact

Imagine standing at a crossroads, deciding how your company can best contribute to the fight against climate change. Carbon credits offer a clear path forward, but not all projects are created equal. Some focus on avoiding emissions, while others are dedicated to removing emissions already in the atmosphere. Both approaches play a vital role in decelerating the rise of emissions and addressing the excess COâ‚‚ impacting our planet.

​

At Freeze Carbon, we specialize in high-impact projects, carefully chosen for their integrity and effectiveness. We avoid areas prone to greenwashing, such as forestry, wood cookstoves, and (grid connected) renewable energy, to ensure that every initiative we support creates real and measurable impact.

Learning Academy.png

Avoidance vs. Removal: The Two Pillars of Carbon Credits

  1. Avoidance Projects

These projects prevent COâ‚‚ and other greenhouse gas emissions from entering the atmosphere by replacing high-emission practices with sustainable alternatives. For example:

  • Generating biogas by converting animal manure into a clean energy source, avoiding methane emissions from traditional waste management practices.

  • Switching from wood and charcoal cooking to electric cooking, reducing deforestation and indoor air pollution while cutting COâ‚‚ emissions.

  • Flaring methane from landfills, a common practice in the Global North, to prevent methane emissions in regions where this technology is not yet widely adopted, such as the Global South.

  1. Removal Projects

These projects actively remove COâ‚‚ from the atmosphere. Whether through nature or technology, removal solutions address the critical need to reverse the damage already done. Examples include:

  • Nature-based approaches like biochar, which enriches soil while locking away carbon.

  • Enhanced rock weathering, where finely crushed minerals are spread over land to chemically bind COâ‚‚ from the air while improving soil health.

  • Cutting-edge technologies like Direct Air Capture, where COâ‚‚ is filtered from the air and stored permanently in solid form.

Our Focus: The Most Impactful Project Types

At Freeze Carbon, we prioritize innovative, verifiable, and transparent projects to drive meaningful climate action. Here are the key project types we support:

Agriculture (Biochar and Methane Gas Avoidance)

By improving traditional farming practices, agricultural projects can avoid and reduce emissions. Examples include:

  • Enhancing soil health through biochar, which locks carbon in the ground while improving crop yields.

  • Reducing methane emissions from livestock with advanced manure management techniques.

Direct Air Capture (DAC)

A transformative technology, DAC filters COâ‚‚ directly from the atmosphere and converts it into a stable, solid form for permanent storage. While costly and technically challenging, DAC represents a growing pillar of the carbon market, fuelled by innovation and increasing demand.

Enhanced Weathering

This cutting-edge method accelerates natural processes by grinding rocks like basalt into fine powder. When exposed to elements like rain and wind, the powdered rock binds atmospheric COâ‚‚, which eventually becomes stable on the ocean floor. Enhanced weathering offers a scalable, science-backed solution for long-term carbon removal.

Household & Community Projects

These initiatives bring sustainability to local communities while delivering tangible benefits. For example, these projects help transition households from using firewood and coal to cook to using electric cookers.

Learning Academy (1).png

Why We Don’t Support Certain Project Types

We are committed to avoiding greenwashing and ensuring every project aligns with our high standards for quality and transparency. As a result, we exclude:

  • Forestry Projects with Future Potential: Many forestry projects are based on the assumption that newly planted trees will grow to maturity, which can take 20-60 years—time we don’t have to address the climate crisis. This reliance on future potential makes their immediate impact uncertain.

  • Forestry Projects with Reversibility Risks: Forestry initiatives often lack reliable emission calculations and face challenges like reversibility (fire, landowner changes) and leakage (shifting logging to other areas), making it difficult to guarantee long-term impact.

  • Renewable Energy: While impactful in many contexts, renewable energy projects are now widely established and often no longer require additional support from carbon credits.

  • Wood Cookstoves: While switching from wood and charcoal to cleaner cooking methods is important, these projects often face challenges in accurately quantifying emission reductions and ensuring sustained usage over time.

Learning Academy (1) (1).png

Making an Informed Choice

Choosing the right carbon credits requires careful evaluation of its impact, transparency, and alignment with your company’s goals. By focusing on innovative, scientifically backed solutions, Freeze Carbon ensures your contributions drive meaningful change and support the transition to a low-carbon future.

bottom of page